A review is not a verdict with a number on it. It is a per-criterion breakdown plus written comments, and the breakdown is what tells you where to spend your effort.
Read it in this order
- Find the criteria scored 1 or 2. Those are the only ones standing between you and a qualifying result.
- Read the comment attached to each of those criteria before reading the overall comment.
- Check which Competency Domain each weak criterion maps to. A single weak criterion can be what is holding one Domain below its threshold.
- Leave the criteria scored 3 and 4 alone. Rewriting work that already qualified risks losing a score you had.
Resubmitting
A needs-revision decision reopens your submission for work. Revise it and submit again — a new review is written against the new version, and the earlier review stays on the record as history rather than being replaced by the new one.
If you think a review is wrong
Reviews can be corrected, and the mechanism is built in: a corrected review supersedes the original, and both stay visible. Contact support with the submission in question and what you believe was misread. The original is never deleted, so a correction never erases what was first said.
Open this in MasarUX
Related articles
- How Human Review worksA reviewer scores each published criterion from 1 to 4 and returns one of three decisions.
- Formal ProjectsThe submitted work a human reviewer reads — how to prepare it, submit it, and what happens next.
- Earning a Professional CredentialWhat a path requires, how eligibility is computed, and what the credential records.
Still need help?
If this did not answer your question, the FAQ covers the shortest answers and our support team reads every message.