Skip to main content
MasarUX
Human Review & Credentials

How Human Review works

A reviewer scores each published criterion from 1 to 4 and returns one of three decisions.

Human Review is the part of MasarUX that cannot be automated, and it is the reason a Professional Credential means something different from a Course Certificate. A person reads your submitted work and scores it against criteria that were published before you started.

The four-point scale

ScoreLabelWhat it means
1Not evidentMissing, or too vague to assess from what you submitted.
2EmergingAttempted, with real gaps a reviewer would flag before this could ship.
3SolidSound and complete enough to stand on its own professionally.
4StrongBeyond the requirement, with clear and well-justified craft.

The three possible decisions

DecisionWhat it means for you
ApproveThe work stands. Its qualifying scores become verifying evidence.
Needs revisionThe work is not finished. You revise the named parts and resubmit.
RejectThe submission does not meet the brief as submitted.

Reviews are never edited or deleted

Once a review is written it is permanent. If a reviewer needs to correct one, they write a new review that supersedes the old one, and both remain on the record with their dates and authors. You can see that a correction happened, what it changed, and when.

This protects you as much as it protects the record. A score cannot quietly change under you, and a correction in your favour is equally visible.

The oral defence, on the final Project only

A path's final Project carries an additional oral defence step, recorded as pending, passed or failed alongside the written review. No other Project type has one — it is rejected on any other submission rather than quietly ignored.

Still need help?

If this did not answer your question, the FAQ covers the shortest answers and our support team reads every message.